In the midst of the Queen’s “still seething wrath,” Tony Blair was denied a knighthood.

0

In the midst of the Queen’s “still seething wrath,” Tony Blair was denied a knighthood.

According to royal commentator Richard Kay, TONY BLAIR was denied a knighthood due to “still simmering animosity” from the Queen.

Tonight, a new installment of ‘Blair and Brown: The New Labour Revolution’ will debut.

The five-part docuseries tells the story of two prominent individuals who are at the center of a political movement.

Mr. Blair, Gordon Brown, and their closest allies recount New Labour’s rise to power and legacy. The focus of tonight’s program is on the early accomplishments that followed the landslide victory in the 1997 general election, both at home and abroad.

However, only a few months into their first terms, fissures began to surface as the No. 10 and No. 11 teams began to turn on one another.

The second episode will show tonight at 9 p.m. on BBC Two. It’ll be available on BBC iPlayer as well.

Mr. Blair was elected Prime Minister with the greatest parliamentary majority in Labour’s history, with a 179-vote margin.

Mr. Blair quit as Prime Minister after three consecutive electoral victories more than 14 years ago.

In the years since his retirement from Downing Street, he has received numerous honors, including the Presidential Medal of Freedom from then-US President George W. Bush.

However, he has yet to be recognized by his own country.

Last year, the Sunday Times reported that the Queen’s purported dislike of Tony Blair had led in other top people being “bedlocked.”

It was reported that Gordon Brown’s induction into the Order of the Garter was halted because Her Majesty was hesitant to bestow the same honor on his predecessor.

Indeed, the “still simmering hatred,” as the Daily Mail’s editor at large Richard Kay put it, is claimed to have been sparked by Mr Blair’s handling of Princess Diana’s murder in 1997.

Personal animosity, on the other hand, has been disregarded by royal advisers as a factor in who is admitted to the Orders and who is not.

The comments are “absurd,” according to a royal source, and “suggest a pettiness that just does not exist.”

“It is ludicrous to claim there is something churlish about the way honors are decided,” they stated.

Mr Kay noted that the death of the Princess of Wales, which occurred just months after her arrival at No.10, “challenged the conventional etiquette that exists between premier and queen like no other before or after.”

“Dealing with his attempts to. “Brinkwire Summary News,” he stated.

Share.

Comments are closed.