Since the 1980s, this country has been experiencing a slow-motion British Revolution, and one of its main targets has always been the police. Did you fail to notice? You weren’t supposed to. This was the first revolution in history to alter morals, laws, and regulations while leaving all structures intact. No concentration camps, guillotines, or barricades. Just an arrogant, annoying visage telling you what to think and how to think it.
This is the true reason why the man who stabbed poor Henry Nowak was pampered and petted while he lay dying like a criminal. Even the government and the BBC have realized how obvious it is. Instead of an unbiased police force that justly upholds the law, we now have a political police “service” that aims to appease a liberal elite.
I guess it would be foolish of me to expect anyone to have noticed, given that I’ve only been repeating this for almost 20 years. But at this point, you can’t ignore it. You will need to start over and create a proper police force, similar to the one we once had, if you want to be properly policed. After that, we can fire all of these worthless paramilitary social workers. Yes, I really do mean it.
Actually, starting in the 1960s, this nation’s once-conservative police force—which was primarily composed of huge, traditionally-minded men who patrolled the streets on foot in the rain—was already in peril. What had been was shattered by one blow after another, and something worse took its place.
Police were handled as though they couldn’t be relied upon to adhere to the law by the Police and Criminal Evidence Act of 1984 and its standards of conduct regarding officers’ interactions with suspects.
According to Peter Hitchens, Henry Nowak, who was fatally stabbed in December of last year, was “treated as a criminal while he lay dying.”
Outside the Southampton Central Police Station, demonstrators hold signs bearing Henry’s final words.
In a completely futile attempt to become more effective and contemporary, constables had been removed from the streets and placed in cars and offices. For many police officers, the job became a sedentary one. They had faced pressure to hire women simply because they were female rather than because they were the most qualified applicants, just like a lot of other traditional, male-dominated organizations.
In order to do this, the previous minimum height limitations were eventually eliminated in 1990. The “W” in the previous WPC level was dropped nine years later. It was evident that progressive graduates—many of whom were women, like Cressida Dick—were being encouraged to advance.
They even altered their appearance in 1994. The current pseudo-military attire, particularly the “duty belt” with its conspicuously visible handcuffs and baton, along with flat caps and high-visibility coats, gradually supplanted the traditional tunic and helmet with a hidden truncheon. Baseball caps are now available.
The old police constable’s oath, which was to serve the Queen and enforce the law “without favor or affection, malice or ill-will, and that I will to the best of my power cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property,” was drastically changed in 2002 to include a commitment to uphold “Human Rights.”
The phrase “with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people” has been added to the main passage.
That was the point at which the change became apparent, but it did not entail “two-tier policing,” the absurd phrase that some people are currently promoting. Everyone receives the same appalling policing, unless a scandal or significant disturbance compels them to get out of their cars or come blinking from their distant office buildings to enforce what remains of the law.
According to Peter Hitchens, “if you want to be properly policed, you’ll have to start over and build a proper police force, like the one we used to have.”
The horrific Macpherson probe report from 1999 was a terrible blow to our nation’s prudent police.
Simply said, English laws are now based on a politically acceptable People’s Republic rather than Christianity and monarchy. Henry Nowak’s situation is particularly terrible because the officer disregarded the dying young man’s request for assistance in an impolite and casual manner. However, the police are not there to stop stabbings or the other crimes that precede them, particularly the widespread, unchecked use of brain-frying illegal narcotics, which is why stabbings are sadly common in this country.
They are unable to unburgle, unmug, or unstab you. It is truly of very little use to show up later. A fire can be extinguished by a firefighter. A paramedic might save a life, but what can a police officer do after a crime other than take notes and assign crime numbers?
However, if you let Marxoid dogmas from the 1960s to keep you from recognizing what has really happened and to make you see things that aren’t there, this stupid reactive policing is much worse than worthless. That is what occurred in the Nowak case, but it also occurs in a lot of other cases.
Where has Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, been for the past 25 years? She seemed to believe that the Macpherson Report on Stephen Lawrence’s horrific murder had been a step in the right direction in her piece published in the Daily Mail yesterday. “Stephen’s murder compelled the nation to confront the unthinkable and say: “This is not who we are,” she wrote. Indeed, since then, a lot of battles have been won to improve and equalize our society.
Do I understand this correctly? That the Tory leader believes this process was aided by the 1999 Macpherson Report? I have some news for her if that’s the case. Wise policing in this nation was severely damaged by that horrifying text. In paragraph 45:24, it called for the prohibition of “color-blind” policing. The police must provide a service that takes into account the various demands, perspectives, and experiences of a varied society.
Macpherson actually advocated for the widespread application of the absurd criteria that “a racist incident is any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person” a little earlier in the horrifying paragraph 45:17. Isn’t this an endorsement by liberals for a new kind of racial or other discrimination? And since then, isn’t that what we have been receiving?
Surely we want colorblind policing? However, Macpherson had another desire, which we are now discovering.
It was hard to substantiate or disprove its conclusion that the Metropolitan Police were guilty of “institutional racism.” Importantly, Stokely Carmichael, an American black power leader, coined the difficult catch-all phrase in 1967. In 1970, Carmichael, a vile anti-Semite, told TV host David Frost that he believed Hitler to be a genius. Should a charge created by someone like that have served as the foundation for Britain’s police force’s comprehensive reinvention?
Henry Nowak’s lonesome demise and dehumanizing handcuffing were inevitably caused by his expansive reimagining. Since Macpherson, political conservatism has been remarkably weak on this issue. Evidence that the police are no longer protecting the public is mounting daily; they are pursuing thought crimes with remarkable vigor while disregarding burglaries, marijuana possession, and vandalism. And they dismiss criticism with rage.
However, since Macpherson took office several years ago, what have the Tories really done about it? Nothing. In a way, you can understand why they have avoided the assignment because it is so enormous. Can this continue, though? The officer who physically assaulted Mr. Nowak said, “I don’t think so, mate.”
