THE heated and at times ill-tempered debate in recent weeks about the degree to which different sectors of the economy should be open amid the coronavirus crisis seems to be in stark contrast to the pulling together at the outset of this terrible pandemic.
It is easy to understand why people are frustrated and impatient because of their feelings.
Unemployment has skyrocketed. Consumers are in financial need. The adverse effect of a shutdown on mental health has been well-documented. Businesses, particularly in the consumer market, have been facing major challenges in the marketplace.
The rates of coronavirus infection is dismaying, which leads to hospitalization and death.
Drastic action is required to save lives. There is no dispute that.
It is understandable that there is controversy about the particular steps that should be taken, what constitutes appropriate conduct, and what does not. But the claims today seem to have developed in a way that implies that it’s a choice between keeping the economy running or combating the virus. Such a reckless mentality, in any case, is a naive and misleading viewpoint on the situation.
That which involves saving the lives of thousands is something that must be done. It is difficult to pick.
Perhaps most importantly, the government must eradicate the virus if it is to have a positive impact on the economy in the medium and long term. Taiwan is an example of a nation that officials instantly recognized and responded to the extent of their capabilities. The economy in this East Asian island democracy has been stable and performed well.
Brexit: The uncomfortable facts about Boris Johnson discovered by Emmanuel Macron and Danny Blanchflower.
Taiwan clearly had the experience of coping with the SARS outbreak in 2003, and this time had the benefit of understanding early on what was happening in Wuhan, as well as having total clarity that it was an imminent danger to its citizens in terms of its geography and transport ties with the People’s Republic of China.
However, it is a fine example that shows that virus resistance and prosperity can be brought together. Certainly, these are not mutually exclusive, as one would think considering the radical views held by some UK political figures.
Taiwan also deserves praise for rapidly reporting the Wuhan outbreak to the World Health Organization. The question is how the World Health Organisation should have acted more effectively to avoid the spread of the virus.
With the advent of a new strain of the coronavirus, the situation has become increasingly complex in the U.K.
In addition, a second wave of CoviD-19 was discovered in European countries as early as early August.
Unfortunately, the British government has been caught off guard by the creation of the crisis.
In late August, Boris Johnson said that he wanted people to go back to work.
At the time, Chancellor Rishi Sunak, who had spent part of the summer supporting his Eat Out to Help Out campaign, insisted that the U.K. There will be no extension under any conditions.
Ian McConnell on Brexit: The bitter fruits of the Conservative split are manifesting in the public’s perception of the situation.
Of course, Mr. Johnson has continued to warn about the deteriorating health situation, and he stresses what must be done in order to improve health. He must initiate this behavior. He must also do so simply and regularly, since we have seen clear mixed signals from other nations. the government has been most unfortunate and destructive in this crisis.
The Scottish government has been clear with its communications. It has been cautiously regarded. Some people are dissatisfied with the slow and careful approach of Nicola Sturgeon, but it is hard to understand why.
Brexit exposed: The Emperor’s New Clothes longstanding frustration.
There is raising friction between business and government in Scotland. Any of this should have been predicted. After all, the decision had to be taken quickly in light of the changing circumstances. However, problems in this relationship can be overcome by interacting better.