After a major U-turn, Britons will avoid a ‘exorbitant’ £1,750 hotel quarantine fee.
TRAVELERS returning from countries on the red list must stay in a specified hotel for ten days at their own expense. Following a huge Government U-turn, Britons may now be able to avoid the expenses or ask for waivers and rebates. But who qualifies?
Travelers returning from red-list areas can now avoid the £1,750 hotel quarantine fee. Since the implementation of the UK’s traffic light system, red list newcomers have been accountable for covering the cost of obligatory self-isolation.
Britons can travel freely to countries on the green list, according to the UK traffic light system.
Tourists arriving from environmentally friendly areas are exempt from quarantine.
Although the government advises against visiting amber countries, it is not illegal to do so; nonetheless, when returning, Britons must self-isolate for 10 days.
Red-list countries, on the other hand, have the strictest restrictions, requiring travelers to quarantine for 10 days at their own expense in a designated hotel.
When coming from a nation on the red list, self-isolation costs £1,750 per person.
In a stunning U-turn, the government has now amended the terms.
It has been announced that red list newcomers will not be required to pay the self-isolation fee if they can demonstrate that they are experiencing financial hardship.
For individuals who are most vulnerable to the levy, new “waivers or price reductions” will be available.
Many people stated they couldn’t afford the charges and threatened to sue the government if they couldn’t afford them.
PGMBM, an international law practice, filed a lawsuit in the United States Supreme Court.
The levies, it argued, discriminated against low- and no-income people who couldn’t afford to travel as a result.
Britons who are forced to return from a nation on the red list face hefty fines.
They must not only pay £1,750 per person to cover the costs of a hotel quarantine, but they must also submit to two PCR tests on days two and eight.
“This legislation was hurried through parliament and adopted without adequate thinking as to how its one-size-fits-all implementation would penalize vulnerable individuals and residents,” said Taylor Burgess, a senior associate at PGMBM.
“While we are glad that our challenge has prompted the government to rethink the policy, it is unfortunate that it has had to resort to legal action in order to make adjustments.
“Over the past several months, many thousands of people have been subjected to outrageous prices or have been completely prevented from performing critical tasks.”Brinkwire Summary News”.